
Dick and Carey Model
Dick and Carey Model Overview
The Dick and Carey Model of Instructional Design was first published in 1978. It was one of the main models used in instructional design for decades to follow (Pappas, November 24, 2015). The premise of this model is an iterative and comprehensive systems view, rather than looking at the process as discreet steps (Instructional Designers of Penn State, n.d.). In the model, there are 10 interconnected components, including several predominant analyses at the forefront. Important emphases of this model are that it is learner-centered and that it focuses on alignment (with goals, objectives, assessments, and materials).
Implications of the Dick and Carey Model for Instructional Design
Identifying Instructional Goals
In this component, broad, overall instructional goals for the learning experience are created. These goals often tie to higher goals in the organization and may be informed by a learning gap analysis.
Instructional Analysis
The Instructional Designer (ID) uses Instructional analysis to determine what type of learning is going to be done based upon the aforementioned instructional goal and taking into account the context of the learning and learner characteristics.
Learner Analysis
From the Learner Analysis, the ID should gain insights about why learners will be joining the learning experience, what their learning preferences are, and what skills and knowledge the learners already have in regard to the instructional goal.
Construct Performance Objectives
Specific performance objectives (or learning objectives) that stem from the instructional goal are established. These goals should be measurable, should be at the appropriate level of learning as established in the instructional analysis, and should add to learner existing skills and knowledge.
Develop Assessments
Assessment should be made to determine whether each of the learning objectives are met. Included in this would be ensuring that the appropriate type of learning is being assessed (that is, that they're aligned with the type of learning in the learning objective). These assesmenst could be traditional post-tests (or final projects, etc.), but also practice items to check progress.
Develop Instructional Strategy
Instructional strategies should use the prior analysis as well as appropriate learning theories to lay out how content will be presented and activities that will be used in the learning experience. Additionally, if any pre-instructional activities are required, that should be stated here.
Develop and Select Instructional Materials
Materials to deliver content (such as textbooks, lectures, videos, etc.) as well as activities to engage students are created and/or curated in this component. These should allow the learner to reach the learning objectives as measured by the assessments. Learner preferences discovered in the learner analysis should be considered. Additionally, the ID should again ensure that the appropriate type of learning can be facilitated through these materials.
​Formative Evaluation
Formative evaluation is used to identify areas in the learning experience that should be improved. This might use a pilot study and/or expert analysis and should be conducted prior to administering the course for the first time (and can continue to be used for continuous improvement processes.)
Revision
Revisions could happen at any time during the process. When completing revisions, instructional goals and learning objectives should always be a the forefront of the revision decisions.
Summative Evaluation
Summative evaluation(s) should be developed and delivered. These can be to check on whether the learning goals are being met (and, ideally, retained outside of the learning experience), whether learners are satisfied with their experience, and if conducted in a business setting, if the business is benefiting from the learners going through the learning experience. And, of course, the information gleaned from these evaluations should be used to improve upon the learning experience for future implementation.
The Dick and Carey model allows instructional designers to follow a systematic process that is highly focused on the learner (Evanick, June 22, 2023). So, the model can help IDs keep their focus on the learner, not just the content.
Similarly, not only is the model focused on the learner, but “Dick and Carey believe that the instructor, learners, materials, instructional activities, delivery system, and learning work together to produce the desired outcomes.” (Instructional Designers of Penn State, n.d.). So, IDs should see themselves as part of the learning experience rather than an outside party overseeing the experience, as might be the inclination for some.
Further, the model is particularly useful to newer Instructional Designers because it prescribes a lot of reflection (Pappas, Feb. 28, 2024). This can help newer instructional designers revise and develop until an effective learning experience is the outcome. The model can also help newer as well as seasoned, instructional designers to remember to align goals, materials, and assessments.
Strengths and Limitations of the Dick and Carey Model in Higher Education (Opinion)
I believe the Dick and Carey Model is well suited for use in higher education. One advantage is that it is a well-known, proven model used in this setting. This should allow for easier collaboration when warranted because it is likely that most instructional designers, and many SMEs (instructors) will be familiar with the model. Another strength is that the structured approach is consistent with the relatively structured nature of academia. Similarly, the model is better suited to a longer learning experience that would be repeated many times, which is the case in higher education. One other strength is particularly for online courses in higher education. These can be depersonalized given the lack of human proximity. However, the learner-centeredness of the Dick and Carey Model, can help to keep the focus on the learner so it might not feel as impersonal.
​
One limitation of the Dick and Carey model used in higher education is the expense. Getting budgeted dollars can be quite tricky in academia. Another limitation is the difficulty with which it is to do formative evaluation in this setting, whether it be individual, small group, and field trials, I feel this is unlikely to happen at least to the extent suggested by the model. The learning experiences themselves are long and you are unlikely to have the time or the learners to provide such feedback.
Evanick, J. (June 22, 2023). Which Instructional Design Model is Best for Online Higher Education. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/which-instructional-design-model-is-best-for-online-higher-education
​
Instructional Designers of Penn State. (n.d.). “Dick and Carey Model of Design.” Instructional Designer’s Handbook. Retrieved on 4/28/2024 from https://psu.pb.unizin.org/idhandbook/chapter/dick-carey/
​
Pappas, C. (November 24, 2015). 9 Steps to Apply the Dick and Carey Model in eLearning. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/9-steps-to-apply-the-dick-and-carey-model-in-elearning